Source author record

Alessio Langiu

Alessio Langiu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Abelian Powers and Repetitions in Sturmian Words

Richomme, Saari and Zamboni (J. Lond. Math. Soc. 83: 79-95, 2011) proved that at every position of a Sturmian word starts an abelian power of exponent $k$ for every $k > 0$. We improve on this result by studying the maximum exponents of abelian powers and abelian repetitions (an abelian repetition is an analogue of a fractional power) in Sturmian words. We give a formula for computing the maximum exponent of an abelian power of abelian period $m$ starting at a given position in any Sturmian word of rotation angle $α$. vAs an analogue of the critical exponent, we introduce the abelian critical exponent $A(s_α)$ of a Sturmian word $s_α$ of angle $α$ as the quantity $A(s_α) = limsup\ k_{m}/m=limsup\ k'_{m}/m$, where $k_{m}$ (resp. $k'_{m}$) denotes the maximum exponent of an abelian power (resp.~of an abelian repetition) of abelian period $m$ (the superior limits coincide for Sturmian words). We show that $A(s_α)$ equals the Lagrange constant of the number $α$. This yields a formula for computing $A(s_α)$ in terms of the partial quotients of the continued fraction expansion of $α$. Using this formula, we prove that $A(s_α) \geq \sqrt{5}$ and that the equality holds for the Fibonacci word. We further prove that $A(s_α)$ is finite if and only if $α$ has bounded partial quotients, that is, if and only if $s_α$ is $β$-power-free for some real number $β$. Concerning the infinite Fibonacci word, we prove that: i) The longest prefix that is an abelian repetition of period $F_j$, $j>1$, has length $F_j( F_{j+1}+F_{j-1} +1)-2$ if $j$ is even or $F_j( F_{j+1}+F_{j-1} )-2$ if $j$ is odd, where $F_{j}$ is the $j$th Fibonacci number; ii) The minimum abelian period of any factor is a Fibonacci number. Further, we derive a formula for the minimum abelian periods of the finite Fibonacci words

preprint2015arXiv

Algorithms for Longest Common Abelian Factors

In this paper we consider the problem of computing the longest common abelian factor (LCAF) between two given strings. We present a simple $O(σ~ n^2)$ time algorithm, where $n$ is the length of the strings and $σ$ is the alphabet size, and a sub-quadratic running time solution for the binary string case, both having linear space requirement. Furthermore, we present a modified algorithm applying some interesting tricks and experimentally show that the resulting algorithm runs faster.

preprint2013arXiv

Abelian Repetitions in Sturmian Words

We investigate abelian repetitions in Sturmian words. We exploit a bijection between factors of Sturmian words and subintervals of the unitary segment that allows us to study the periods of abelian repetitions by using classical results of elementary Number Theory. We prove that in any Sturmian word the superior limit of the ratio between the maximal exponent of an abelian repetition of period $m$ and $m$ is a number $\geq\sqrt{5}$, and the equality holds for the Fibonacci infinite word. We further prove that the longest prefix of the Fibonacci infinite word that is an abelian repetition of period $F_j$, $j>1$, has length $F_j(F_{j+1}+F_{j-1} +1)-2$ if $j$ is even or $F_j(F_{j+1}+F_{j-1})-2$ if $j$ is odd. This allows us to give an exact formula for the smallest abelian periods of the Fibonacci finite words. More precisely, we prove that for $j\geq 3$, the Fibonacci word $f_j$ has abelian period equal to $F_n$, where $n = \lfloor{j/2}\rfloor$ if $j = 0, 1, 2\mod{4}$, or $n = 1 + \lfloor{j/2}\rfloor$ if $ j = 3\mod{4}$.

preprint2013arXiv

Order-Preserving Suffix Trees and Their Algorithmic Applications

Recently Kubica et al. (Inf. Process. Let., 2013) and Kim et al. (submitted to Theor. Comp. Sci.) introduced order-preserving pattern matching. In this problem we are looking for consecutive substrings of the text that have the same "shape" as a given pattern. These results include a linear-time order-preserving pattern matching algorithm for polynomially-bounded alphabet and an extension of this result to pattern matching with multiple patterns. We make one step forward in the analysis and give an $O(\frac{n\log{n}}{\log\log{n}})$ time randomized algorithm constructing suffix trees in the order-preserving setting. We show a number of applications of order-preserving suffix trees to identify patterns and repetitions in time series.

preprint2012arXiv

Note on the Greedy Parsing Optimality for Dictionary-Based Text Compression

Dynamic dictionary-based compression schemes are the most daily used data compression schemes since they appeared in the foundational papers of Ziv and Lempel in 1977, commonly referred to as LZ77. Their work is the base of Deflate, gZip, WinZip, 7Zip and many others compression software. All of those compression schemes use variants of the greedy approach to parse the text into dictionary phrases. Greedy parsing optimality was proved by Cohn et al. (1996) for fixed length code and unbounded dictionaries. The optimality of the greedy parsing was never proved for bounded size dictionary which actually all of those schemes require. We define the suffix-closed property for dynamic dictionaries and we show that any LZ77-based dictionary, including the bounded variants, satisfy this property. Under this condition we prove the optimality of the greedy parsing as a variant of the proof by Cohn et al.

preprint2012arXiv

The Rightmost Equal-Cost Position Problem

LZ77-based compression schemes compress the input text by replacing factors in the text with an encoded reference to a previous occurrence formed by the couple (length, offset). For a given factor, the smallest is the offset, the smallest is the resulting compression ratio. This is optimally achieved by using the rightmost occurrence of a factor in the previous text. Given a cost function, for instance the minimum number of bits used to represent an integer, we define the Rightmost Equal-Cost Position (REP) problem as the problem of finding one of the occurrences of a factor which cost is equal to the cost of the rightmost one. We present the Multi-Layer Suffix Tree data structure that, for a text of length n, at any time i, it provides REP(LPF) in constant time, where LPF is the longest previous factor, i.e. the greedy phrase, a reference to the list of REP({set of prefixes of LPF}) in constant time and REP(p) in time O(|p| log log n) for any given pattern p.