Source author record

Aldo Rustichini

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

econ.TH math.PR Neurons and Cognition

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works

3topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2021arXiv

Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: inside and outside the black box

We provide two characterizations, one axiomatic and the other neuro-computational, of the dependence of choice probabilities on deadlines, within the widely used softmax representation $p_{t}\left( a,A\right) =\dfrac{e^{\frac{u\left( a\right) }{λ\left( t\right) }+α\left( a\right) }}{\sum_{b\in A}e^{\frac{u\left( b\right) }{λ\left( t\right) }+α\left( b\right) }}%$ where $p_{t}\left( a,A\right)$ is the probability that alternative $a$ is selected from the set $A$ of feasible alternatives if $t$ is the time available to decide, $λ$ is a time dependent noise parameter measuring the unit cost of information, $u$ is a time independent utility function, and $α$ is an alternative-specific bias that determines the initial choice probabilities reflecting prior information and memory anchoring. Our axiomatic analysis provides a behavioral foundation of softmax (also known as Multinomial Logit Model when $α$ is constant). Our neuro-computational derivation provides a biologically inspired algorithm that may explain the emergence of softmax in choice behavior. Jointly, the two approaches provide a thorough understanding of soft-maximization in terms of internal causes (neurophysiological mechanisms) and external effects (testable implications).

preprint2020arXiv

Axiomatic Tests for the Boltzmann Distribution

The Boltzmann distribution describes a single parameter (temperature) family of probability distributions over a state space; at any given temperature, the ratio of probabilities of two states depends on their difference in energy. The same family is known in other disciplines (economics, psychology, computer science) with different names and interpretations. Such widespread use in very diverse fields suggests a common conceptual structure. We identify it on the basis of few natural axioms. Checking whether observables satisfy these axioms is easy, so our characterization provides a simple empirical test of the Boltzmannian modeling theories.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.