BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Alban Ponse

Alban Ponse contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer Sciencemath.LOmath.RAData Structures and Algorithmsmath.HOProgramming Languages

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
6topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Non-commutative propositional logic with short-circuited biconditional and NAND

Short-circuit evaluation denotes the semantics of propositional connectives in which the second argument is evaluated only if the first argument does not suffice to determine the value of the expression. In programming, short-circuit evaluation is widely used, with left-sequential conjunction and disjunction as primitive connectives. We consider left-sequential, non-commutative propositional logic, also known as MSCL (memorising short-circuit logic), and start from a previously published, equational axiomatisation. First, we extend this logic with a left-sequential version of the biconditional connective, which allows for an elegant axiomatisation of MSCL. Next, we consider a left-sequential version of the NAND operator (the Sheffer stroke) and again give a complete, equational axiomatisation of the corresponding variant of MSCL. Finally, we consider these logical systems in a three-valued setting with a constant for `undefined', and again provide completeness results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Three Datatype Defining Rewrite Systems for Datatypes of Integers each extending a Datatype of Naturals

Integer arithmetic is specified according to three views: unary, binary, and decimal notation. The binary and decimal view have as their characteristic that each normal form resembles common number notation, that is, either a digit, or a string of digits without leading zero, or the negated versions of the latter. The unary view comprises a specification of integer arithmetic based on 0, successor function $S$, and predecessor function, with negative normal forms $-S^i(0)$. Integer arithmetic in binary and decimal notation is based on (postfix) digit append functions. For each view we define a ground-confluent and terminating datatype defining rewrite system (DDRS), and in each case the resulting datatype is a canonical term algebra that extends a corresponding canonical term algebra for natural numbers. Then, for each view, we consider an alternative DDRS based on tree constructors that yield comparable normal forms, which for that binary and decimal view admits expressions that are algorithmically more involved. These DDRSes are incorporated because they are closer to existing literature. For these DDRSes we also provide ground-completeness results. Finally, we define a DDRS for the ring of Integers (comprising fifteen rewrite rules) and prove its ground-completeness.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Equations for formally real meadows

We consider the signatures $Σ_m=(0,1,-,+, \cdot, \ ^{-1})$ of meadows and $(Σ_m, {\mathbf s})$ of signed meadows. We give two complete axiomatizations of the equational theories of the real numbers with respect to these signatures. In the first case, we extend the axiomatization of zero-totalized fields by a single axiom scheme expressing formal realness; the second axiomatization presupposes an ordering. We apply these completeness results in order to obtain complete axiomatizations of the complex numbers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Cancellation Meadows: a Generic Basis Theorem and Some Applications

Let Q_0 denote the rational numbers expanded to a "meadow", that is, after taking its zero-totalized form (0^{-1}=0) as the preferred interpretation. In this paper we consider "cancellation meadows", i.e., meadows without proper zero divisors, such as $Q_0$ and prove a generic completeness result. We apply this result to cancellation meadows expanded with differentiation operators, the sign function, and with floor, ceiling and a signed variant of the square root, respectively. We give an equational axiomatization of these operators and thus obtain a finite basis for various expanded cancellation meadows.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Periodic Single-Pass Instruction Sequences

A program is a finite piece of data that produces a (possibly infinite) sequence of primitive instructions. From scratch we develop a linear notation for sequential, imperative programs, using a familiar class of primitive instructions and so-called repeat instructions, a particular type of control instructions. The resulting mathematical structure is a semigroup. We relate this set of programs to program algebra (PGA) and show that a particular subsemigroup is a carrier for PGA by providing axioms for single-pass congruence, structural congruence, and thread extraction. This subsemigroup characterizes periodic single-pass instruction sequences and provides a direct basis for PGA's toolset.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access