Source author record

Alan Wassyng

Alan Wassyng appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Software Engineering Cryptography and Security Logic in Computer Science

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Supporting Modularity in Simulink Models

Model-Based Development (MBD) is widely used for embedded controls development, with Matlab Simulink being one of the most used modelling environments in industry. As with all software, Simulink models are subject to evolution over their lifetime and must be maintained. Modularity is a fundamental software engineering principle facilitating the construction of complex software, and is used in textual languages such as C. However, as Simulink is a graphical modelling language, it is not currently well understood how modularity can be leveraged in development with Simulink, nor whether it can be supported with current Simulink modelling constructs. This paper presents an effective way of achieving modularity in Simulink by introducing the concept of a Simulink module. The effectiveness of the approach is measured using well-known indicators of modularity, including coupling and cohesion, cyclomatic complexity, and information hiding ability. A syntactic interface is defined in order to represent all data flow across the module boundary. Four modelling guidelines are also presented to encourage best practice. Also, a custom tool that supports the modelling of Simulink modules is described. Finally, this work is demonstrated and evaluated on a real-world example from the nuclear domain.

preprint2019arXiv

Building Confidence in Scientific Computing Software Via Assurance Cases

Assurance cases provide an organized and explicit argument for correctness. They can dramatically improve the certification of Scientific Computing Software (SCS). Assurance cases have already been effectively used for safety cases for real time systems. Their advantages for SCS include engaging domain experts, producing only necessary documentation, and providing evidence that can be verified/replicated. This paper illustrates assurance cases for SCS through the correctness case for 3dfim+, an existing Medical Imaging Application (MIA) for analyzing activity in the brain. This example was partly chosen because of recent concerns about the validity of fMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging) studies. The example justifies the value of assurance cases for SCS, since the existing documentation is shown to have ambiguities and omissions, such as an incompletely defined ranking function and missing details on the coordinate system. A serious concern for 3dfim+ is identified: running the software does not produce any warning about the necessity of using data that matches the parametric statistical model employed for the correlation calculations. Raising the bar for SCS in general, and MIA in particular, is both feasible and necessary - when software impacts safety, an assurance case methodology (or an equivalently rigorous confidence building methodology) should be employed.

preprint2016arXiv

Secure and trusted white-box verification

Verification is the process of checking whether a product has been implemented according to its prescribed specifications. We study the case of a designer (the developer) that needs to verify its design by a third party (the verifier), by making publicly available a limited amount of information about the design, namely a diagram of interconnections between the different design components, but not the components themselves or the intermediate values passed between components. We formalize this notion of limited information using tabular expressions as the description method for both the specifications and the design. Treating verification as a process akin to testing, we develop protocols that allow for the design to be verified on a set of inputs generated by the verifier, using any test-case generating algorithm that can take advantage of this extra available information (partially white-box testing), and without compromising the developer's secret information. Our protocols work with both trusted and untrusted developers, and allow for the checking of the correctness of the verification process itself by any third party, and at any time.

preprint2015arXiv

Formal Verification of Real-Time Function Blocks Using PVS

A critical step towards certifying safety-critical systems is to check their conformance to hard real-time requirements. A promising way to achieve this is by building the systems from pre-verified components and verifying their correctness in a compositional manner. We previously reported a formal approach to verifying function blocks (FBs) using tabular expressions and the PVS proof assistant. By applying our approach to the IEC 61131-3 standard of Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), we constructed a repository of precise specification and reusable (proven) theorems of feasibility and correctness for FBs. However, we previously did not apply our approach to verify FBs against timing requirements, since IEC 61131-3 does not define composite FBs built from timers. In this paper, based on our experience in the nuclear domain, we conduct two realistic case studies, consisting of the software requirements and the proposed FB implementations for two subsystems of an industrial control system. The implementations are built from IEC 61131-3 FBs, including the on-delay timer. We find issues during the verification process and suggest solutions.