Source author record

Alan Lew

Alan Lew appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the $d$-dimensional algebraic connectivity of graphs

The $d$-dimensional algebraic connectivity $a_d(G)$ of a graph $G=(V,E)$, introduced by Jordán and Tanigawa, is a quantitative measure of the $d$-dimensional rigidity of $G$ that is defined in terms of the eigenvalues of stiffness matrices (which are analogues of the graph Laplacian) associated to mappings of the vertex set $V$ into $\mathbb{R}^d$. Here, we analyze the $d$-dimensional algebraic connectivity of complete graphs. In particular, we show that, for $d\geq 3$, $a_d(K_{d+1})=1$, and for $n\geq 2d$, \[ \left\lceil\frac{n}{2d}\right\rceil-2d+1\leq a_d(K_n) \leq \frac{2n}{3(d-1)}+\frac{1}{3}. \]

preprint2020arXiv

Representability and boxicity of simplicial complexes

Let $X$ be a simplicial complex on vertex set $V$. We say that $X$ is $d$-representable if it is isomorphic to the nerve of a family of convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We define the $d$-boxicity of $X$ as the minimal $k$ such that $X$ can be written as the intersection of $k$ $d$-representable simplicial complexes. This generalizes the notion of boxicity of a graph, defined by Roberts. A missing face of $X$ is a set $τ\subset V$ such that $τ\notin X$ but $σ\in X$ for any $σ\subsetneq τ$. We prove that the $d$-boxicity of a simplicial complex on $n$ vertices without missing faces of dimension larger than $d$ is at most $\left\lfloor\frac{1}{d+1}\binom{n}{d}\right\rfloor$. The bound is sharp: the $d$-boxicity of a simplicial complex whose set of missing faces form a Steiner $(d,d+1,n)$-system is exactly $\frac{1}{d+1}\binom{n}{d}$.