Source author record

Alan Fekete

Alan Fekete appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Worst-Case Optimal Radix Triejoin

Relatively recently, the field of join processing has been swayed by the discovery of a new class of multi-way join algorithms. The new algorithms join multiple relations simultaneously rather than perform a series of pairwise joins. The new join algorithms satisfy stronger worst-case runtime complexity guarantees than any of the existing approaches based on pairwise joins -- they are worst-case optimal in data complexity. These research efforts have resulted in a flurry of papers documenting theoretical and some practical contributions. However, there is still the quest of making the new worst-case optimal join algorithms truly practical in terms of (1) ease of implementation and (2) secondary index efficiency in terms of number of indexes created to answer a query. In this paper, we present a simple worst-case optimal multi-way join algorithm called the radix triejoin. Radix triejoin uses a binary encoding for reducing the domain of a database. Our main technical contribution is that domain reduction allows a bit-interleaving of attribute values that gives rise to a query-independent relation representation, permitting the computation of multiple queries over the same relations worst-case optimally without having to construct additional secondary indexes. We also generalise the core algorithm to conjunctive queries with inequality constraints and provide a new proof technique for the worst-case optimal join result.

preprint2014arXiv

Coordination Avoidance in Database Systems (Extended Version)

Minimizing coordination, or blocking communication between concurrently executing operations, is key to maximizing scalability, availability, and high performance in database systems. However, uninhibited coordination-free execution can compromise application correctness, or consistency. When is coordination necessary for correctness? The classic use of serializable transactions is sufficient to maintain correctness but is not necessary for all applications, sacrificing potential scalability. In this paper, we develop a formal framework, invariant confluence, that determines whether an application requires coordination for correct execution. By operating on application-level invariants over database states (e.g., integrity constraints), invariant confluence analysis provides a necessary and sufficient condition for safe, coordination-free execution. When programmers specify their application invariants, this analysis allows databases to coordinate only when anomalies that might violate invariants are possible. We analyze the invariant confluence of common invariants and operations from real-world database systems (i.e., integrity constraints) and applications and show that many are invariant confluent and therefore achievable without coordination. We apply these results to a proof-of-concept coordination-avoiding database prototype and demonstrate sizable performance gains compared to serializable execution, notably a 25-fold improvement over prior TPC-C New-Order performance on a 200 server cluster.

preprint2013arXiv

Highly Available Transactions: Virtues and Limitations (Extended Version)

To minimize network latency and remain online during server failures and network partitions, many modern distributed data storage systems eschew transactional functionality, which provides strong semantic guarantees for groups of multiple operations over multiple data items. In this work, we consider the problem of providing Highly Available Transactions (HATs): transactional guarantees that do not suffer unavailability during system partitions or incur high network latency. We introduce a taxonomy of highly available systems and analyze existing ACID isolation and distributed data consistency guarantees to identify which can and cannot be achieved in HAT systems. This unifies the literature on weak transactional isolation, replica consistency, and highly available systems. We analytically and experimentally quantify the availability and performance benefits of HATs--often two to three orders of magnitude over wide-area networks--and discuss their necessary semantic compromises.