BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ajay Vishwanath

Ajay Vishwanath contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceComputation and LanguageInformation Retrieval

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

COVID-19 Twitter Dataset with Latent Topics, Sentiments and Emotions Attributes

This paper describes a large global dataset on people's discourse and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic over the Twitter platform. From 28 January 2020 to 1 June 2022, we collected and processed over 252 million Twitter posts from more than 29 million unique users using four keywords: "corona", "wuhan", "nCov" and "covid". Leveraging probabilistic topic modelling and pre-trained machine learning-based emotion recognition algorithms, we labelled each tweet with seventeen attributes, including a) ten binary attributes indicating the tweet's relevance (1) or irrelevance (0) to the top ten detected topics, b) five quantitative emotion attributes indicating the degree of intensity of the valence or sentiment (from 0: extremely negative to 1: extremely positive) and the degree of intensity of fear, anger, sadness and happiness emotions (from 0: not at all to 1: extremely intense), and c) two categorical attributes indicating the sentiment (very negative, negative, neutral or mixed, positive, very positive) and the dominant emotion (fear, anger, sadness, happiness, no specific emotion) the tweet is mainly expressing. We discuss the technical validity and report the descriptive statistics of these attributes, their temporal distribution, and geographic representation. The paper concludes with a discussion of the dataset's usage in communication, psychology, public health, economics, and epidemiology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Towards Artificial Virtuous Agents: Games, Dilemmas and Machine Learning

Machine ethics has received increasing attention over the past few years because of the need to ensure safe and reliable artificial intelligence (AI). The two dominantly used theories in machine ethics are deontological and utilitarian ethics. Virtue ethics, on the other hand, has often been mentioned as an alternative ethical theory. While this interesting approach has certain advantages over popular ethical theories, little effort has been put into engineering artificial virtuous agents due to challenges in their formalization, codifiability, and the resolution of ethical dilemmas to train virtuous agents. We propose to bridge this gap by using role-playing games riddled with moral dilemmas. There are several such games in existence, such as Papers, Please and Life is Strange, where the main character encounters situations where they must choose the right course of action by giving up something else dear to them. We draw inspiration from such games to show how a systemic role-playing game can be designed to develop virtues within an artificial agent. Using modern day AI techniques, such as affinity-based reinforcement learning and explainable AI, we motivate the implementation of virtuous agents that play such role-playing games, and the examination of their decisions through a virtue ethical lens. The development of such agents and environments is a first step towards practically formalizing and demonstrating the value of virtue ethics in the development of ethical agents.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access