BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Aditi Krishak

Aditi Krishak contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.COastro-ph.IMhep-exastro-ph.GAgr-qc

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
5topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Search for a distance-dependent Baryonic Tully-Fisher Relation at low redshifts

A recent work (arXiv:2104.14481) has found a statistically significant transition in the Baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR) using low redshift data ($z<0.1$), with the transitions occurring at about 9 and 17 Mpc. Motivated by this finding, we carry out a variant of this analysis by fitting the data to an augmented BTFR, where both the exponent as well as normalization constant vary as a function of distance. We find that both the exponent and normalization constant show only a marginal variation with distance, and are consistent with a constant value, to within $2σ$. We also checked to see if there is a statistically significant difference between the BTFR results after bifurcating the dataset at distances of 9 and 17 Mpc. We find that almost all the sets of subsamples obey the BTFR with $χ^2$/dof close to 1 and the best-fit parameters consistent across the subsamples. Only the subsample with $D<17$ Mpc shows a marginal discrepancy (at $1.75σ$) with respect to the BTFR. Therefore, we do not find any evidence for statistically significant differences in the BTFR at distances of 9 and 17 Mpc.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An independent search for annual modulation and its significance in ANAIS-112 data

We perform an independent search for sinusoidal-based modulation in the recently released ANAIS-112 data, which could be induced by dark matter scatterings. We then evaluate this hypothesis against the null hypothesis that the data contains only background, using four different model comparison techniques. These include frequentist, Bayesian, and two information theory-based criteria (AIC and BIC). This analysis was done on both the residual data (by subtracting the exponential fit obtained from the ANAIS-112 Collaboration) as well as the total (non-background subtracted) data. We find that according to the Bayesian model comparison test, the null hypothesis of no modulation is decisively favored over a cosine-based annual modulation for the non-background subtracted dataset in 2-6 keV energy range. None of the other model comparison tests decisively favor any one hypothesis over another. This is the first application of Bayesian and information theory techniques to test the annual modulation hypothesis in ANAIS-112 data, extending our previous work on the DAMA/LIBRA and COSINE-100 data. Our analysis codes have also been made publicly available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Model Comparison tests of modified gravity from the Eöt-Wash experiment

Perivolaropoulos et al (arXiv:1904.09462) (P19) have argued that the residual torque data in the Eöt-Wash experiment is consistent with an oscillating signal. This could either be a signature of non-local modified gravity theories or some other systematic error in the data. We independently assess the viability of such an oscillating signal in the same data using Bayesian and information theoretical criterion, to complement the frequentist analysis in P19. We fit this data to three different parametrizations (an offset Newtonian, Yukawa, and an oscillating model), and assess the significance of the oscillating model using AIC, BIC, WAIC, and Bayes factor. All these techniques provide decisive evidence for the oscillating model compared to the Newtonian model, provided the phase is fixed to the same value as in P19. If the phase is allowed to vary, then significance from BIC, WAIC, and Bayes based tests reduces to strong evidence, whereas only AIC still shows decisive evidence. Our analysis codes have been made publicly available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Robust model comparison tests of DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation

We evaluate the statistical significance of the DAMA/LIBRA claims for annual modulation using three independent model comparison techniques, viz frequentist, information theory, and Bayesian analysis. We fit the data from the DAMA/LIBRA experiment to both cosine and a constant model, and carry out model comparison by choosing the constant model as the null hypothesis. For the frequentist test, we invoke Wilk&#39;s theorem and calculate the significance using $Δχ^2$ between the two models. For information theoretical tests, we calculate the difference in Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information criterion (BIC) between the two models. We also compare the two models in a Bayesian context by calculating the Bayes factor. We also search for higher harmonics in the DAMA/LIBRA data using generalized Lomb-Scargle periodogram. We finally test the sensitivity of these model comparison techniques in discriminating between pure noise and a cosine signal using synthetic data. This is the first proof of principles application of AIC, BIC as well as Bayes factor to the DAMA data. All our analysis codes along with the data used in this work have been made publicly available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access