Researcher profile

Adam M. Edwards

Adam M. Edwards contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
1works
0followers
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Precision Aggregated Local Models

Large scale Gaussian process (GP) regression is infeasible for larger data sets due to cubic scaling of flops and quadratic storage involved in working with covariance matrices. Remedies in recent literature focus on divide-and-conquer, e.g., partitioning into sub-problems and inducing functional (and thus computational) independence. Such approximations can be speedy, accurate, and sometimes even more flexible than an ordinary GPs. However, a big downside is loss of continuity at partition boundaries. Modern methods like local approximate GPs (LAGPs) imply effectively infinite partitioning and are thus pathologically good and bad in this regard. Model averaging, an alternative to divide-and-conquer, can maintain absolute continuity but often over-smooths, diminishing accuracy. Here we propose putting LAGP-like methods into a local experts-like framework, blending partition-based speed with model-averaging continuity, as a flagship example of what we call precision aggregated local models (PALM). Using $K$ LAGPs, each selecting $n$ from $N$ total data pairs, we illustrate a scheme that is at most cubic in $n$, quadratic in $K$, and linear in $N$, drastically reducing computational and storage demands. Extensive empirical illustration shows how PALM is at least as accurate as LAGP, can be much faster in terms of speed, and furnishes continuous predictive surfaces. Finally, we propose sequential updating scheme which greedily refines a PALM predictor up to a computational budget.