Researcher profile

Adam Hutchinson

Adam Hutchinson contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Modelling the transport of relativistic solar protons along a heliospheric current sheet during historic GLE events

There are many difficulties associated with forecasting high-energy solar particle events at Earth. One issue is understanding why some large solar eruptive events trigger ground level enhancement (GLE) events and others do not. In this work we perform 3D test particle simulations of a set of historic GLEs to understand more about what causes these powerful events. Particular focus is given to studying how the heliospheric current sheet (HCS) affects high-energy proton transport through the heliosphere following an event. Analysis of $\geq$M7.0 flares between 1976$-$2020 shows that active regions located closer to the HCS ($<$10$^{\circ}$) are more likely to be associated with a GLE event. We found that modelled GLE events where the source region was close to the HCS also led to increased heliospheric transport in longitude and higher count rates (when the Earth was located in the drift direction). In a model that does not include perpendicular diffusion associated with turbulence, the HCS is the dominant mechanism affecting heliospheric particle transport for GLE 42 and 69, and varying other parameters (e.g. a narrow, 10$^{\circ}$, or wider, 60$^{\circ}$, injection width) causes little change. Overall in our model, the HCS is relevant in 71$\%$ of our analysed GLEs and including it more accurately reproduces observed intensities near Earth. Our simulations enable us to produce model profiles at Earth that can be compared to existing observations by the GOES satellites and neutron monitors, as well as for use in developing future forecasting models.

preprint2021arXiv

Energetic Proton Back-Precipitation onto the Solar Atmosphere in Relation to Long-Duration Gamma-Ray Flares

Gamma-ray emission during long-duration gamma-ray flare (LDGRF) events is thought to be caused mainly by $>$300 MeV protons interacting with the ambient plasma at or near the photosphere. Prolonged periods of the gamma-ray emission have prompted the suggestion that the source of the energetic protons is acceleration at a coronal mass ejection (CME)-driven shock, followed by particle back-precipitation onto the solar atmosphere over extended times. We study the latter hypothesis using test particle simulations, which allow us to investigate whether scattering associated with turbulence aids particles in overcoming the effect of magnetic mirroring, which impedes back-precipitation by reflecting particles as they travel sunwards. The instantaneous precipitation fraction, $P$, the proportion of protons that successfully precipitate for injection at a fixed height, $r_i$, is studied as a function of scattering mean free path, $λ$ and $r_i$. Upper limits to the total precipitation fraction, $\overline{P}$, were calculated for eight LDGRF events for moderate scattering conditions ($λ$=0.1 au). We find that the presence of scattering helps back-precipitation compared to the scatter-free case, although at very low $λ$ values outward convection with the solar wind ultimately dominates. For eight LDGRF events, due to strong mirroring, $\overline{P}$ is very small, between 0.56 and 0.93% even in the presence of scattering. Time-extended acceleration and large total precipitation fractions, as seen in the observations, cannot be reconciled for a moving shock source according to our simulations. Therefore, it is not possible to obtain both long duration $γ$ ray emission and efficient precipitation within this scenario. These results challenge the CME shock source scenario as the main mechanism for $γ$ ray production in LDGRFs.