Researcher profile

Adam Case

Adam Case contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

The intersection of algorithmically random closed sets and effective dimension

In this article, we study several aspects of the intersections of algorithmically random closed sets. First, we answer a question of Cenzer and Weber, showing that the operation of intersecting relatively random closed sets (with respect to certain underlying measures induced by Bernoulli measures on the space of codes of closed sets), which preserves randomness, can be inverted: a random closed set of the appropriate type can be obtained as the intersection of two relatively random closed sets. We then extend the Cenzer/Weber analysis to the intersection of multiple random closed sets, identifying the Bernoulli measures with respect to which the intersection of relatively random closed sets can be non-empty. We lastly apply our analysis to provide a characterization of the effective Hausdorff dimension of sequences in terms of the degree of intersectability of random closed sets that contain them.

preprint2016arXiv

Bounded Turing Reductions and Data Processing Inequalities for Sequences

A data processing inequality states that the quantity of shared information between two entities (e.g. signals, strings) cannot be significantly increased when one of the entities is processed by certain kinds of transformations. In this paper, we prove several data processing inequalities for sequences, where the transformations are bounded Turing functionals and the shared information is measured by the lower and upper mutual dimensions between sequences. We show that, for all sequences $X,Y,$ and $Z$, if $Z$ is computable Lipschitz reducible to $X$, then \[ mdim(Z:Y) \leq mdim(X:Y) \text{ and } Mdim(Z:Y) \leq Mdim(X:Y). \] We also show how to derive different data processing inequalities by making adjustments to the computable bounds of the use of a Turing functional. The yield of a Turing functional $Φ^S$ with access to at most $n$ bits of the oracle $S$ is the smallest input $m \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $Φ^{S \upharpoonright n}(m)\uparrow$. We show how to derive reverse data processing inequalities (i.e., data processing inequalities where the transformation may significantly increase the shared information between two entities) for sequences by applying computable bounds to the yield of a Turing functional.

preprint2016arXiv

Mutual Dimension and Random Sequences

If $S$ and $T$ are infinite sequences over a finite alphabet, then the lower and upper mutual dimensions $mdim(S:T)$ and $Mdim(S:T)$ are the upper and lower densities of the algorithmic information that is shared by $S$ and $T$. In this paper we investigate the relationships between mutual dimension and coupled randomness, which is the algorithmic randomness of two sequences $R_1$ and $R_2$ with respect to probability measures that may be dependent on one another. For a restricted but interesting class of coupled probability measures we prove an explicit formula for the mutual dimensions $mdim(R_1:R_2)$ and $Mdim(R_1:R_2)$, and we show that the condition $Mdim(R_1:R_2) = 0$ is necessary but not sufficient for $R_1$ and $R_2$ to be independently random. We also identify conditions under which Billingsley generalizations of the mutual dimensions $mdim(S:T)$ and $Mdim(S:T)$ can be meaningfully defined; we show that under these conditions these generalized mutual dimensions have the "correct" relationships with the Billingsley generalizations of $dim(S)$, $Dim(S)$, $dim(T)$, and $Dim(T)$ that were developed and applied by Lutz and Mayordomo; and we prove a divergence formula for the values of these generalized mutual dimensions.

preprint2015arXiv

Reachability Problems for Continuous Chemical Reaction Networks

Chemical reaction networks (CRNs) model the behavior of molecules in a well-mixed system. The emerging field of molecular programming uses CRNs not only as a descriptive tool, but as a programming language for chemical computation. Recently, Chen, Doty and Soloveichik introduced a new model of chemical kinetics, rate-independent continuous CRNs (CCRNs), to study the chemical computation of continuous functions. A fundamental question of a CRN is whether a state of the system is reachable through a sequence of reactions in the network. This is known as the reachability problem. In this paper, we investigate CCRN-REACH, the reachability problem for this model of chemical reaction networks. We show that, for continuous CRNs, constructing a path to a state of the network is computable in polynomial time. We also prove that a related problem, Sub-CCRN-REACH, is NP-complete.

preprint2014arXiv

Mutual Dimension

We define the lower and upper mutual dimensions $mdim(x:y)$ and $Mdim(x:y)$ between any two points $x$ and $y$ in Euclidean space. Intuitively these are the lower and upper densities of the algorithmic information shared by $x$ and $y$. We show that these quantities satisfy the main desiderata for a satisfactory measure of mutual algorithmic information. Our main theorem, the data processing inequality for mutual dimension, says that, if $f:\mathbb{R}^m \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$ is computable and Lipschitz, then the inequalities $mdim(f(x):y) \leq mdim(x:y)$ and $Mdim(f(x):y) \leq Mdim(x:y)$ hold for all $x \in \mathbb{R}^m$ and $y \in \mathbb{R}^t$. We use this inequality and related inequalities that we prove in like fashion to establish conditions under which various classes of computable functions on Euclidean space preserve or otherwise transform mutual dimensions between points.