Researcher profile

Abhishek Nair

Abhishek Nair contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Automatic Hardware Trojan Insertion using Machine Learning

Due to the current horizontal business model that promotes increasing reliance on untrusted third-party Intellectual Properties (IPs), CAD tools, and design facilities, hardware Trojan attacks have become a serious threat to the semiconductor industry. Development of effective countermeasures against hardware Trojan attacks requires: (1) fast and reliable exploration of the viable Trojan attack space for a given design and (2) a suite of high-quality Trojan-inserted benchmarks that meet specific standards. The latter has become essential for the development and evaluation of design/verification solutions to achieve quantifiable assurance against Trojan attacks. While existing static benchmarks provide a baseline for comparing different countermeasures, they only enumerate a limited number of handcrafted Trojans from the complete Trojan design space. To accomplish these dual objectives, in this paper, we present MIMIC, a novel AI-guided framework for automatic Trojan insertion, which can create a large population of valid Trojans for a given design by mimicking the properties of a small set of known Trojans. While there exist tools to automatically insert Trojan instances using fixed Trojan templates, they cannot analyze known Trojan attacks for creating new instances that accurately capture the threat model. MIMIC works in two major steps: (1) it analyzes structural and functional features of existing Trojan populations in a multi-dimensional space to train machine learning models and generate a large number of "virtual Trojans" of the given design, (2) next, it binds them into the design by matching their functional/structural properties with suitable nets of the internal logic structure. We have developed a complete tool flow for MIMIC, extensively evaluated the framework by exploring several use-cases, and quantified its effectiveness to demonstrate highly promising results.

preprint2022arXiv

Proof-Stitch: Proof Combination for Divide and Conquer SAT Solvers

With the increasing availability of parallel computing power, there is a growing focus on parallelizing algorithms for important automated reasoning problems such as Boolean satisfiability (SAT). Divide-and-Conquer (D&C) is a popular parallel SAT solving paradigm that partitions SAT instances into independent sub-problems which are then solved in parallel. For unsatisfiable instances, state-of-the-art D&C solvers generate DRAT refutations for each sub-problem. However, they do not generate a single refutation for the original instance. To close this gap, we present Proof-Stitch, a procedure for combining refutations of different sub-problems into a single refutation for the original instance. We prove the correctness of the procedure and propose optimizations to reduce the size and checking time of the combined refutations by invoking existing trimming tools in the proof-combination process. We also provide an extensible implementation of the proposed technique. Experiments on instances from last year's SAT competition show that the optimized refutations are checkable up to seven times faster than unoptimized refutations.