BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Abhay Sharma

Abhay Sharma appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Information Theorymath.ITGenomics

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
3topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Computationally Tractable Algorithms for Finding a Subset of Non-defective Items from a Large Population

In the classical non-adaptive group testing setup, pools of items are tested together, and the main goal of a recovery algorithm is to identify the "complete defective set" given the outcomes of different group tests. In contrast, the main goal of a "non-defective subset recovery" algorithm is to identify a "subset" of non-defective items given the test outcomes. In this paper, we present a suite of computationally efficient and analytically tractable non-defective subset recovery algorithms. By analyzing the probability of error of the algorithms, we obtain bounds on the number of tests required for non-defective subset recovery with arbitrarily small probability of error. Our analysis accounts for the impact of both the additive noise (false positives) and dilution noise (false negatives). By comparing with the information theoretic lower bounds, we show that the upper bounds on the number of tests are order-wise tight up to a $\log^2K$ factor, where $K$ is the number of defective items. We also provide simulation results that compare the relative performance of the different algorithms and provide further insights into their practical utility. The proposed algorithms significantly outperform the straightforward approaches of testing items one-by-one, and of first identifying the defective set and then choosing the non-defective items from the complement set, in terms of the number of measurements required to ensure a given success rate.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On Finding a Subset of Healthy Individuals from a Large Population

In this paper, we derive mutual information based upper and lower bounds on the number of nonadaptive group tests required to identify a given number of "non defective" items from a large population containing a small number of "defective" items. We show that a reduction in the number of tests is achievable compared to the approach of first identifying all the defective items and then picking the required number of non-defective items from the complement set. In the asymptotic regime with the population size $N \rightarrow \infty$, to identify $L$ non-defective items out of a population containing $K$ defective items, when the tests are reliable, our results show that $\frac{C_s K}{1-o(1)} (Φ(α_0, β_0) + o(1))$ measurements are sufficient, where $C_s$ is a constant independent of $N, K$ and $L$, and $Φ(α_0, β_0)$ is a bounded function of $α_0 \triangleq \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty} \frac{L}{N-K}$ and $β_0 \triangleq \lim_{N\rightarrow \infty} \frac{K} {N-K}$. Further, in the nonadaptive group testing setup, we obtain rigorous upper and lower bounds on the number of tests under both dilution and additive noise models. Our results are derived using a general sparse signal model, by virtue of which, they are also applicable to other important sparse signal based applications such as compressive sensing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Reanalyzing variable directionality of gene expression in transgenerational epigenetic inheritance

A previous report claimed no evidence of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in a mouse model of in utero environmental exposure, based on the observation that gene expression changes observed in the germ cells of G1 and G2 male fetus were not in the same direction. A subsequent data reanalysis however showed a statistically significant overlap between G1 and G2 genes irrespective of direction, leading to the suggestion that, as phenotypic variability in epigenetic transmission has been observed in several other examples also, the above report provided evidence in favor of, not against, transgenerational inheritance. This criticism has recently been questioned. Here, it is shown that the questions raised are based not only on incorrect statistical calculations but also on wrong premise that gene expression changes do not constitute a phenotype.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access