Researcher profile

Aaron J. Fillo

Aaron J. Fillo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Assessing diffusion model impacts on enstrophy and flame structure in turbulent lean premixed flames

Diffusive transport of mass occurs at small scales in turbulent premixed flames. As a result, multicomponent mass diffusion, which is often neglected in direct numerical simulations (DNS) of premixed combustion, has the potential to impact both turbulence and flame characteristics at small scales. In this study, we evaluate these impacts by examining enstrophy dynamics and the internal structure of the flame for lean premixed hydrogen-air combustion, neglecting secondary Soret and Dufour effects. We performed three-dimensional DNS of these flames by implementing the Stefan-Maxwell equations in the code NGA to represent multicomponent mass transport, and we simulated statistically planar lean premixed hydrogen-air flames using both mixture-averaged and multicomponent models. The mixture-averaged model underpredicts the peak enstrophy by up to 13% in the flame front. Comparing the enstrophy budgets of these flames, the multicomponent simulation yields larger peak magnitudes compared to the mixture-averaged simulation in the reaction zone, showing differences of 17% and 14% in the normalized stretching and viscous effects terms. In the super-adiabatic regions of the flame, the mixture-averaged model overpredicts the viscous effects by up to 13%. To assess the effect of these differences on flame structure, we reconstructed the average local internal structure of the turbulent flame through statistical analysis of the scalar gradient field. Based on this analysis, we show that large differences in viscous effects contribute to significant differences in the average local flame structure between the two models.

preprint2022arXiv

Impact of fuel chemistry on the global consumption speed of large hydrocarbon fuel/air flames

Large hydrocarbon fuels are used for ground and air transportation and will be for the foreseeable future. Despite their extensive use, turbulent combustion of large hydrocarbon fuels, remains relatively poorly understood and difficult to predict. A key parameter when burning these fuels is the turbulent consumption speed; the velocity at which fuel and air are consumed through a turbulent flame front. Such information can be useful as a model input parameter and for validation of modeled results. In this study, turbulent consumption speeds were measured for three jet-like fuels using a premixed turbulent Bunsen burner. The burner was used to independently control turbulence intensity, unburned temperature, and equivalence ratio. Each fuel had similar heat releases (within 2%), laminar flame speeds (within 5-15 %), and adiabatic flame temperatures. Despite this similarity, for constant Re_D and turbulence intensity, A2 (i.e., jet-A) has the highest turbulent flame speeds and remains stable (i.e., without tip quenching) at lower ϕ than the other fuels evaluated. In contrast the C1 fuel, which contains no aromatics, has the slowest turbulent flame speeds and exhibits tip quenching at higher ϕ then the other fuels. C1 was the most sensitive to the influence of turbulence, as evidenced by this fuel having the largest ratio of turbulent to laminar flame speeds. The C1 fuel had the highest stretch sensitivity, in general, as indicated by calculated Markstein numbers. This work shows that turbulent flame speeds and tip stability of multi-component large hydrocarbon fuels can be sensitive to the chemical class of its components. The results from the current work indicate that caution may be needed when using alternative or surrogate fuels to replicate conventional fuels, especially if the alternative fuels are missing chemical classes of fuels that influence stretch sensitivities.

preprint2019arXiv

A fast, low-memory, and stable algorithm for implementing multicomponent transport in direct numerical simulations

Implementing multicomponent diffusion models in reacting-flow simulations is computationally expensive due to the challenges involved in calculating diffusion coefficients. Instead, mixture-averaged diffusion treatments are typically used to avoid these costs. However, to our knowledge, the accuracy and appropriateness of the mixture-averaged diffusion models has not been verified for three-dimensional turbulent premixed flames. In this study we propose a fast,efficient, low-memory algorithm and use that to evaluate the role of multicomponent mass diffusion in reacting-flow simulations. Direct numerical simulation of these flames is performed by implementing the Stefan-Maxwell equations in NGA. A semi-implicit algorithm decreases the computational expense of inverting the full multicomponent ordinary diffusion array while maintaining accuracy and fidelity. We first verify the method by performing one-dimensional simulations of premixed hydrogen flames and compare with matching cases in Cantera. We demonstrate the algorithm to be stable, and its performance scales approximately with the number of species squared. Then, as an initial study of multicomponent diffusion, we simulate premixed, three-dimensional turbulent hydrogen flames, neglecting secondary Soret and Dufour effects. Simulation conditions are carefully selected to match previously published results and ensure valid comparison. Our results show that using the mixture-averaged diffusion assumption leads to a 15% under-prediction of the normalized turbulent flame speed for a premixed hydrogen-air flame. This difference in the turbulent flame speed motivates further study into using the mixture-averaged diffusion assumption for DNS of moderate-to-high Karlovitz number flames.