Researcher profile

A. V. Mosenkov

A. V. Mosenkov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Isochrone fitting of Galactic globular clusters -- II. NGC6205 (M13)

We present new isochrone fits to colour-magnitude diagrams of the Galactic globular cluster NGC\,6205 (M13). We utilise 34 photometric bands from the ultraviolet to mid-infrared by use of data from the {\it HST}, {\it Gaia} DR2, SDSS, unWISE, Pan-STARRS DR1, and other photometric sources. In our isochrone fitting we use the PARSEC, MIST, DSEP, BaSTI, and IAC-BaSTI theoretical models and isochrones, both for the solar-scaled and He-$α$-enhanced abundances, with a metallicity of about [Fe/H]$=-1.58$ adopted from the literature. The colour-magnitude diagrams, obtained with pairs of filters from different datasets but of similar effective wavelengths, show some colour offsets up to 0.04 mag between the fiducial sequences and isochrones. We attribute these offsets to systematic differences of the datasets. Some intrinsic systematic differences of the models/isochrones remain in our results: the derived distances and ages are different for the ultraviolet, optical and infrared photometry used, while the derived ages are different for the different models/isochrones, e.g. in the optical range from $12.3\pm0.7$ Gyr for He-$α$-enhanced DSEP to $14.4\pm0.7$ Gyr for MIST. Despite the presence of multiple stellar populations, we obtain convergent estimates for the dominant population: best-fitting distance $7.4\pm0.2$ kpc, true distance modulus $14.35\pm0.06$ mag, parallax $0.135\pm0.004$ mas, extinction $A_\mathrm{V}=0.12\pm0.02$, and reddening $E(B-V)=0.04\pm0.01$. These estimates agree with other recent estimates, however, the extinction and reddening are twice as high as generally accepted. The derived empirical extinction law agrees with the Cardelli-Clayton-Mathis extinction law with the best-fitting $R_\mathrm{V}=3.1^{+1.6}_{-1.1}$.

preprint2010arXiv

Bulges and discs of spiral galaxies: edge-on perspective

We present a sample of edge-on spiral galaxies both of early and late types.The sample consists of 175 galaxies in the Ks-filter, 169 galaxies in the H-filter and 165 galaxies in the J-filter. Bulge and disc decompositions of each galaxy image, taken from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS), were performed. We discuss several scaling relations for bulges and discs which indicate a tight link between their formation and evolution. We show that galaxies with bulges fitted by the Sersic index n<2 (pseudobulges) have quite different distributions of their structural parameters than galaxies with n>=2 bulges (classical bulges). First of all, the distribution of the apparent bulge axis ratio q_b for the subsample with n<2 can be attributed to triaxial, nearly prolate bulges, while n>=2 bulges seem to be oblate spheroids with moderate flattening. Secondly, the Photometric Plane of the sample bulges is not flat and has a prominent curvature towards small values of n. Thirdly, despite of the existence of a clear relation between the flattening of stellar discs h/z_0 and the relative mass of a spherical component, the distributions over both parameters are quite different for galaxies possesing bulges and pseudobulges.