Researcher profile

A. Travesset

A. Travesset contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

hep-lat cond-mat.stat-mech hep-ph hep-th

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - Baseline

2works

0followers

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint1998arXiv

The Renormalization Group and its Finite Lattice Approximations

We investigate finite lattice approximations to the Wilson Renormalization Group in models of unconstrained spins. We discuss first the properties of the Renormalization Group Transformation (RGT) that control the accuracy of this type of approximations and explain different methods and techniques to practically identify them. We also discuss how to determine the anomalous dimension of the field. We apply our considerations to a linear sigma model in two dimensions in the domain of attraction of the Ising Fixed Point using a Bell-Wilson RGT. We are able to identify optimal RGTs which allow accurate computations of quantities such as critical exponents, fixed point couplings and eigenvectors with modest statistics. We finally discuss the advantages and limitations of this type of approach.

preprint1997arXiv

The phase diagram of the $U(2) \times U(2)$ Sigma Model and its Implications for Chiral Hierarchies

Motivated by the issue of whether it is possible to construct phenomenologically viable models where the electroweak symmetry breaking is triggered by new physics at a scale $Λ\gg 4πv$, where $v$ is the order parameter of the transition ($v\sim 250$ GeV) and $Λ$ is the scale of new physics, we have studied the phase diagram of the $U(2) \times U(2)$ model. This is the relevant low energy effective theory for a class of models which will be discussed below. We find that the phase transition in these models is first order in most of parameter space. The order parameter can not be made much smaller than the cut-off and, consequently a large hierarchy does not appear sustainable. In the relatively small region in the space of parameters where the phase transition is very weakly first order or second order the model effectively reduces to the O(8) theory for which the triviality considerations should apply.