BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

A. T. Sutinjo

A. T. Sutinjo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.IM

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

System equivalent flux density of a low-frequency polarimetric phased array interferometer

This paper extends the treatment of system equivalent flux density (SEFD) in Sutinjo, A. T. et al. (2021) (Paper I) to interferometric phased array telescopes. The objective is to develop an SEFD formula involving only the most fundamental assumptions and one that is readily applicable to phased array interferometer radio observations. Then, we aimed at comparing the resultant SEFD expression against the often-used root-mean-square (RMS) SEFD approximation, SEFDrmsI = (1/2)(SEFD^2_XX + SEFD^2_YY)^(1/2) to study the inaccuracy of the SEFDrms. We take into account all mutual coupling and noise coupling within an array environment (intra-array coupling). This intra-array noise coupling is included in the SEFD expression through the realized noise resistance of the array, which accounts for the system noise. No assumption is made regarding the polarization (or lack thereof) of the sky nor the orthogonality of the antenna elements. The fundamental noise assumption is that, in phasor representation, the real and imaginary components of a given noise source are independent and equally distributed (iid) with zero mean. Noise sources that are mutually correlated and non-iid among themselves are allowed, provided the real and imaginary components of each noise source are iid. The system noise is uncorrelated between array entities separated by a baseline distance, which in the case of the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) is typically tens of wavelengths or greater. By comparing the resulting SEFD formula to the SEFD_I^rms approximation, we proved that SEFD_I^rms always underestimates the SEFD, which leads to an overestimation of array sensitivity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

System equivalent flux density of Stokes I, Q, U, V of a polarimetric interferometer

We present the system equivalent flux density (SEFD) expressions for all four Stokes parameters: I, Q, U, V. The expressions were derived based on our derivation of SEFD I (for Stokes I) and subsequent extensions of that work to phased array and multipole interferometers. The key to the derivation of the SEFD Q, U, V expressions is to recognize that the noisy estimates of Q, U, V can be written as the trace of a matrix product. This shows that the SEFD I is a special case, where the general case involves a diagonal or anti-diagonal 2x2 matrix interposed in the matrix multiplication. Following this step, the relation between the SEFD for I and Q, U, V becomes immediately evident. We present example calculations for a crossed dipole based on the formulas derived and the comparison between simulation and observation using the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

System Equivalent Flux Density of a Polarimetric Tripole Radio Interferometer

System equivalent flux density (SEFD) is an important figure of merit of a radio telescope. This paper aims to derive a general expression for SEFD of a polarimetric tripole interferometer. The derivation makes only two basic and reasonable assumptions. First, the noise under consideration is zero mean and when expressed in complex phasor domain, has independent and identically distributed (iid) real and imaginary components. Correlated and non-identically distributed noise sources are allowed as long as the real and imaginary components remain iid. Second, the system noise is uncorrelated between the elements separated by a baseline distance. The SEFD expression is derived from first principles, that is the standard deviation of the noisy flux estimate in a target direction due to system noise. The resulting SEFD expression is expressed as a simple matrix operation that involves a mixture of the system temperatures of each antenna and the Jones matrix elements. It is not limited to tripoles, but rather, fully extensible to multipole antennas; it is not limited to mutually orthogonal antennas. To illustrate the usefulness of the expression and how the formula is applied, we discuss an example calculation based on a tripole interferometer on lunar orbit for ultra-long wavelengths observation. We compared the SEFD results based on a formula assuming short dipoles and the general expression. As expected, the SEFDs converge at the ultra-long wavelengths where the dipoles are well-approximated as short dipoles. The general SEFD expression can be applied to any multipole antenna systems with arbitrary shapes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Sensitivity of a Low-Frequency Polarimetric Radio Interferometer

Aims: This paper aims to derive an expression for the sensitivity of a polarimetric radio interferometer that is valid for all-sky observations of arbitrarily polarized sources, with neither a restriction on FoV nor with any a priori assumption regarding the polarization state of the source. We verify the resulting formula with an all-sky observation using the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) telescope. Methods: The sensitivity expression is developed from first principles by applying the concept of System Equivalent Flux Density (SEFD) to a polarimetric radio interferometer not by computing $A_e/T_{sys}$. The SEFD is calculated from the standard deviation of the noisy flux density estimate for a target source due to system noise. Results: The SEFD for a polarimetric radio interferometer is generally not $1/\sqrt{2}$ of a single-polarized interferometer as is often assumed for narrow FoV. This assumption can lead to significant errors for a dual-polarized dipole based system, which is common in low-frequency radio astronomy: up to $\sim 15\%$ for a zenith angle (ZA) coverage of $45^\circ$, and up to $\sim45\%$ for $60^\circ$ coverage. The worst case errors occur in the diagonal planes of the dipole for very wide FoV. This is demonstrated through theory, simulation and observations. Furthermore, using the resulting formulation, calculation of the off-zenith sensitivity is straightforward and unambiguous. Conclusions: For wide FoV observations pertinent to low-frequency radio interferometer such as the SKA-Low, the narrow FoV and the single-polarized sensitivity expressions are not correct and should be replaced by the formula derived in this paper.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access