BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

A. M. Mukhamedzhanov

A. M. Mukhamedzhanov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
nucl-thastro-ph.SRnucl-exastro-ph.IM

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Determination of asymptotic normalization coefficients for the channel $^{16}$O$\to α+^{12}$C. Excited state $^{16}$O($0^+; 6.05$ MeV)

Asymptotic normalization coefficients (ANC) determine the overall normalization of cross sections of peripheral radiative capture reactions. In the present paper, we treat the ANC $C$ for the virtual decay $^{16}$O$(0^+; 6.05$ MeV)$\to α+^{12}$C(g.s.), the known values of which are characterized by a large spread $(0.29-1.65)\times 10^3$ fm$^{-1/2}$. The ANC $C$ is found by analytic continuation in the energy of the $α^{12}$C $s$-wave scattering amplitude, known from the phase-shift analysis of experimental data, to the pole corresponding to the $^{16}$O bound state and lying in the unphysical region of negative energies. To determine $C$, two different methods of analytic continuation are used. In the first method, the scattering data are approximated by the sum of polynomials in energy in the physical region and then extrapolated to the pole. The best way of extrapolation is chosen on the basis of the exactly solvable model. Within the second approach, the ANC $C$ is found by solving the Schrödinger equation for the two-body $α^{12}$C potential, the parameters of which are selected from the requirement of the best description of the phase-shift analysis data at a fixed experimental binding energy of $^{16}$O$(0^+; 6.05$ MeV) in the $α+^{12}$C channel. The values of the ANC $C$ obtained within these two methods lie in the interval (886--1139) fm$^{-1/2}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Status of deep subbarrier $\mathbf{{}^{12}{\rm C}+{}^{12}{\rm C}}$ fusion and advancing the Trojan horse method

In this paper, I will update the current status of the carbon-carbon fusion research taking into account that after the latest analysis [Beck {\it et al.} Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 56}, 97 (2020), Letter to the Editor] new important experimental and theoretical results had been published and will discuss how to advance new THM measurements to extract the low-energy astrophysical $S$-factors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Status on $\mathbf{{}^{12}{\rm C}+{}^{12}{\rm C}}$ fusion at deep subbarrier energies: impact of resonances on astrophysical $S^{*}$ factors

Since the discovery of molecular resonances in $^{12}$C+$^{12}$C in the early sixties a great deal of research work has been undertaken to study $α$-clustering and resonant effects of the fusion process at sub-Coulomb barrier energies. The modified astrophysical $S^{*}$ factors of $^{12}$C+$^{12}$C fusion have been extracted from direct fusion measurements at deep sub-barrier energies near the Gamow window. They were also obtained by the indirect Trojan horse method (THM). A comparison of direct measurements and the THM, which elucidates problems in the analysis of the THM, is discussed in this Letter to the Editor.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

{Once more about astrophysical $S$ factor for the $α+ d \to {}^{6}{\rm Li} + γ$ reaction

Recently to study the radiative capture $α+ d \to {}^{6}{\rm Li} + γ$ process a new measurement of the ${}^{6}{\rm Li}({\rm A\,150\,MeV})$ dissociation in the field of ${}^{208}{\rm Pb}$ has been reported in [F. Hammache {\it et al.} Phys. Rev ${\bf C 82}$, 065803 (2010)]. However, the dominance of the nuclear breakup over the Coulomb one prevented from obtaining the information about the $α+ d \to {}^{6}{\rm Li} + γ$ process from the breakup data. The astrophysical $S_{24}(E)$ factor has been calculated within the $α-d$ two-body potential model with potentials determined from the fits to the $α-d$ elastic scattering phase shifts. However, the scattering phase shift itself doesn't provide a unique $α-d$ bound state potential, which is the most crucial input when calculating the $S_{24}(E)$ astrophysical factor at astrophysical energies. In this work we emphasize an important role of the asymptotic normalization coefficient (ANC) for ${}^{6}{\rm Li} \to α+ d$, which controls the overall normalization of the peripheral $α+ d \to {}^{6}{\rm Li} + γ$ process and is determined by the adopted $α-d$ bound state potential. We demonstrate that the ANC previously determined from the $α-d$ elastic scattering $s$-wave phase shift in [Blokhintsev {\it et. al} Phys. Rev. {\bf C 48}, 2390 (1993)] gives $S_{24}(E)$, which is at low energies about 38% lower than the one reported in [F. Hammache {\it et al.} Phys. Rev ${\bf C 82}$, 065803 (2010)]. We recalculate also the reaction rates, which are also lower than those obtained in [F. Hammache {\it et al.} Phys. Rev ${\bf C 82}$, 065803 (2010)].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Unitary correlation in nuclear reaction theory

We prove that the amplitudes for the (d,p), (d,pn) and (e,e'p) reactions determining the asymptotic behavior of the exact scattering wave functions in the corresponding channels are invariant under unitary correlation operators while the spectroscopic factors are not. Moreover, the exact reaction amplitudes are not parametrized in terms of the spectroscopic factors and cannot provide a tool to determine the spectroscopic factors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access