Researcher profile

A. Generozov

A. Generozov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Forming Young and Hypervelocity Stars in the Galactic Centre via Tidal Disruption of a Molecular Cloud

The Milky Way Galaxy hosts a four million solar mass black hole, Sgr A*, that underwent a major accretion episode approximately 3-6 Myr ago. During the episode, hundreds of young massive stars formed in a disc orbiting Sgr A* in the central half parsec. The recent discovery of a hypervelocity star S5-HVS1, ejected by Sgr A* five Myr ago with a velocity vector consistent with the disc, suggests that this event also produced binary star disruptions. The initial stellar disc has to be rather eccentric for this to occur. Such eccentric disks can form from the tidal disruptions of molecular clouds. Here we perform simulations of such disruptions, focusing on gas clouds on rather radial initial orbits. As a result, stars formed in our simulations are on very eccentric orbits ($\bar{e}\sim 0.6$) with a lopsided configuration. For some clouds counter-rotating stars are formed. As in previous work, we find that such discs undergo a secular gravitational instability that leads to a moderate number of particles obtaining eccentricities of 0.99 or greater, sufficient for stellar binary disruption. We also reproduce the mean eccentricity of the young disk in the Galactic centre, though not the observed surface density profile. We discuss missing physics and observational biases that may explain this discrepancy. We conclude that observed S-stars, hypervelocity stars, and disc stars tightly constrain the initial cloud parameters, indicating a cloud mass between a few$\times 10^4$ and $10^5 M_{\odot}$, and a velocity between $\sim 40$ and 80 km s$^{-1}$ at 10 pc.

preprint2019arXiv

Implications from Late-Time X-ray Detections of Optically Selected Tidal Disruption Events: State Changes, Unification, and Detection Rates

We present Chandra X-ray observations of four optically-selected tidal disruption events (TDEs) obtained 4-9 years after discovery. Three sources were detected with luminosities between 9X10^40 and 3X10^42 erg/s. The spectrum of PTF09axc is consistent with a power law of index 2.5+-0.1, whereas the spectrum of PTF09ge is very soft. The power law spectrum of PTF09axc and prior literature findings, provide evidence that TDEs transition from an early-time soft state to a late-time hard state many years after disruption. We propose that the time to peak luminosity for optical and X-ray emission may differ substantially in TDEs, with X-rays being produced or becoming observable later. This delay helps explain the differences in observed properties such as L_opt/L_ X of optically and X-ray selected TDEs. We update TDE rate predictions for the eROSITA instrument: it ranges from 3 per yr to 990 per yr, depending sensitively on the distribution of black hole spins and the time delay between disruption and peak X-ray brightness. We further predict an asymmetry in the number of retrograde and prograde disks in samples of optically and X-ray selected TDEs. The details of the observational biases can contribute to observed differences between optically and X-ray selected TDEs (with optically selected TDEs being fainter in X-rays for retrograde TDE disks).