Researcher profile

A. Ferrer

A. Ferrer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A search for anomalous Cherenkov rings

The results of a search with the DELPHI Barrel RICH for Cherenkov rings having radii greater than those produced by ultrarelativistic particles are presented. The search for such anomalous rings is based on the data collected by the DELPHI Collaboration at CERN during the LEP1 and LEP2 periods. The DELPHI RICH detector was conceived for the identification of the stable and quasi-stable hadrons ($π/K/p$). The present analysis was made investigating electron-like particles. A subsample of events containing anomalous rings has been identified for which the probability that the reconstructed rings in a given event are due to fortuitous combinations of background hits is low ($10^{-3}$ or less). A detailed study of background sources capable of producing apparently anomalous rings has been done; it indicates that the background hypothesis has a low probability. Additional arguments against this hypothesis are provided by by a comparison of rates of events with single and double anomalous rings in the gaseous radiator, and by the observation of a high degree of correlation between anomalous ring radii in the liquid and gaseous radiators. The results of the present analysis provide an interesting indication of the existence of anomalous Cherenkov rings. To corroborate this indication further searches for anomalous rings need to be made in future dedicated experiments. This work has been performed by the authors following the rules for external access to the DELPHI archived data, as established in http://delphiwww.cern.ch/delsec/finalrules/FINALrules011203.pdf The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this material are those of the authors alone and do not reflect in any way the views of the DELPHI Collabora

preprint2020arXiv

Physical interpretation of the anomalous Cherenkov rings observed with the DELPHI detector

The results of a search with the DELPHI Barrel RICH for anomalous Cherenkov rings having radii greater than those produced by ultrarelativistic particles were reported in our previous paper [1]. The search was based on the data collected by the DELPHI Collaboration at CERN during the LEP1 and LEP2 periods. A detailed study of background sources capable of producing apparently anomalous rings has been done; it indicated that the background hypothesis has a low probability ($10^{-3}$ or less). An additional strong argument against the background hypothesis was provided by the observation of a high degree of correlation between anomalous ring radii in the liquid and gaseous radiators in the selected events.The results obtained are interpreted in this paper in terms of observation of faster-than-light particles (tachyons). In the framework of this interpretation two peaks in the tachyon mass parameter distribution are observed, at $(0.29 \pm 0.01)$~GeV/c$^2$ and $(4.6 \pm 0.2)$~GeV/c$^2$. This work has been performed by the authors following the rules for external access to the DELPHI archived data, as established in http://delphiwww.cern.ch/delsec/finalrules/FINALrules011203.pdf The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this material are those of the authors alone and do not reflect in any way the views of the DELPHI Collaboration.